Overloaded Asbestos Air Samples

Navigating the Complexities of Asbestos Air Monitoring with ISO13794

INTRODUCTION
In the field of air monitoring, specifically when assessing asbestos presence, the intricacies of sample collection and analysis come to the forefront. Over the past 30 years, the Industrial Hygiene experts at Western Health & Safety have examined over 30,000 asbestos air monitoring filters following NIOSH 7400: Asbestos and other Fibres by PCM. It's not uncommon for samples to be voided due to particle overload, a scenario that elicits varied reactions from engineers, building owners, and frontline consultants.

Understanding Sample Overload

Sample overload can catch many by surprise, yet often, the conditions at the time of collection hint at potential issues. Nearby activities, like demolition or heavy machinery operation, can lead to air laden with various particulates such as diesel fumes or drywall dust. Anyone with experience looking through a microscope has seen an interesting array or particulates.

​Advancements in technology, such as the use of cell phone cameras, have enabled laboratory analysts to document the state of filters, offering tangible evidence of the air quality challenges during collection. These visual proofs can be indispensable for clients seeking to understand the impact of environmental conditions on air quality.
​

Filter Loading: A Delicate Balance

Unlike other analytical methods where a higher concentration of the target analyte is preferred, asbestos fiber analysis requires a controlled approach. Excessive particle overlap on filters can render accurate microscopy nearly impossible, obscuring fibers and complicating data interpretation. When using the NIOSH 7400 method along with the NIOSH 7402 Asbestos by TEM, Hygienist on a daily basis are adjusting the sample volume to get the optimum particulate loading. Recognized standards such as NIOSH and AHERA suggest a maximum particulate threshold to maintain the integrity of fiber analysis.
​

The ISO13794 Advantage

In scenarios where traditional methods such as the NIOSH 7400 and NIOSH 7402 falter, ISO13794 emerges as a critical tool. This sophisticated method, though costly, is pivotal in assessing air quality, particularly in high-stakes situations such as litigation or post-disaster assessments. ISO13794's meticulous process includes gravimetric reduction and a sequence of treatments to isolate asbestos fibers for analysis, offering results in precise density and concentration metrics.

​However, the complex nature of these calculations and the preparation process often necessitates expert guidance. For those seeking deeper insight into the nuances of ISO13794 and its implementation in air quality assessment, reaching out to seasoned professionals like Don at Western Health & Safety can demystify the process and provide the necessary clarity.
​

Conclusion

​While no single method can claim to be the panacea for asbestos monitoring challenges, ISO13794 provides a robust alternative when conventional sampling is compromised. As we continue to refine our approaches and leverage advanced technologies, the goal remains unwavering: to ensure accurate monitoring and safe environments. For further details on navigating these complex processes and ensuring the integrity of your air quality assessments, expert consultation is a prudent step towards success.

Contact WHS