WHS - Occupational Hygienist
  • WHS Home
    • WHS Mission
    • WHS Advantage
    • WHS Commitment
    • Artificial Intelligence Policy
  • WHS Core Services
    • Litigation Services
    • Worker Exposure Assessments Services >
      • Welding Fume Assessments
      • Respirable Crystalline Silica
      • BTEX Sampling
      • Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials
      • Isocyanate Sampling and Testing
    • Asbestos Services and Expertise >
      • Asbestos Testing and Sampling Calgary
      • Hazardous Building Materials Investigations
      • Asbestos Management >
        • Asbestos Safety and Testing Services in Calgary
      • Asbestos Worker Certification >
        • Asbestos Training FAQ's
      • Asbestos Testing FAQ's
      • vermiculite Insulation Asbestos >
        • Vermiculite in Building Products
        • MK-5 Spray Applied Fire Proofing
      • Asbestos Contaminated Soil
      • Asbestos Surface Contamination
      • Alberta Asbestos Abatement Manual
      • Why Certified Industrial Hygienists (CIH) Matter in Asbestos Assessments
    • Exposure Control Plans for Designated Substances
    • Indoor Air Quality >
      • Indoor Air Quality Assessments
      • Radon Assessments >
        • Radon FAQ
      • Mould Assessments >
        • Mould Sampling
        • Types of Mould
    • Noise Exposure Assessment >
      • Noise Assessment Services
      • New AB Noise Regulation
      • Frequently Asked Questions - Noise
    • Confined Space
    • Disaster Response Testing Services
  • Contact WHS
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Industrial Hygiene Blog

“New Diesel Particulate Matter Exposure Limit Now in Effect for BC Mines: What You Need to Know”

5/18/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture
Effective May 1, 2025, British Columbia’s mines must comply with a new exposure limit for Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM), measured as Elemental Carbon. The updated limit is now set at 100 µg/m³ over a 10-hour work shift.

This change marks a significant regulatory milestone under the Health, Safety and Reclamation Code for Mines in British Columbia (2024). At Western Health & Safety (WHS), we’re helping our clients understand what this means, how it impacts underground operations, and what immediate steps can be taken to ensure compliance and protect worker health.
​

What has changed?

The new Maximum Allowable Exposure (MAE) for Diesel Particulate Matter is now:
  • 100 µg/m³ (as Elemental Carbon) over a 10-hour time-weighted average.
Previously listed in the Code with a transitional grace period, this limit is now fully enforceable as of May 1, 2025, as per Table 2-1, Item 17 of the BC Mines Code.

Why it matters

DPM is a known occupational carcinogen and is linked to respiratory and cardiovascular conditions, particularly among underground workers operating or working near diesel-powered equipment.
Exceeding this limit:
  • Places workers at risk of long-term health effects
  • Triggers regulatory non-compliance under the Mines Act
  • May result in enforcement action from the Ministry of Energy, Mines and Low Carbon Innovation
    ​

What the Code Requires

Under Part 2 – Occupational Health of the Code:
  • Section 2.1.1 requires that all health hazards, including airborne contaminants like DPM, be assessed and controlled.
  • Section 2.1.3 mandates a written workplace monitoring program managed by a qualified person. This program must specify:
    • The substances to be monitored
    • Sampling frequency and methodology
    • Locations and affected job roles
    • Retention of results for inspection by a Mines Inspector
​

How WHS Can Help

WHS supports mining clients across BC in aligning with the new DPM standard by offering:
  • Baseline Exposure Assessments - Identify high-risk tasks and locations through personal and area sampling.
  • Monitoring Program Development - We can help prepare or revise your written workplace monitoring program in accordance with the Chief Inspector’s Workplace Monitoring Procedures Manual.
  • Control Strategy Implementation - Assist with selecting appropriate engineering and administrative controls, including ventilation improvements and task-based exposure reduction.
  • Respiratory Protection Support - If respirators are needed, we ensure your program complies with CSA Z94.4, including fit testing, selection, and training.
📩 Contact us today to schedule an assessment or request assistance with your site’s monitoring program.
📞 Phone: 403.241.6889
📧 Email: [email protected]


WHS – Western Health & Safety
Protecting Workers. Supporting Compliance. Advancing Health in Mining.


Contact WHS today
Check out WHS Industrial Hygiene Services
0 Comments

What You Need to Know About ASHRAE’s 2025 Position on Indoor Carbon Dioxide

5/2/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture
Indoor carbon dioxide (CO₂) levels have long been used as a shorthand for indoor air quality (IAQ) and ventilation performance—but new guidance from ASHRAE (approved February 12, 2025) offers a more nuanced take. If you’re an HVAC professional, building designer, or facilities manager, this update could reshape how you monitor and manage indoor environments.

In this post, we’ll unpack what ASHRAE’s updated position means, why it matters, and how you can align with best practices going forward.
​

Why This Update Matters

ASHRAE has officially clarified that CO₂ is not a reliable, all-purpose indicator of indoor air quality. That’s a major shift in perception for many professionals and organizations that have relied on CO₂ levels as a go-to metric.
Here’s what’s changing:
  • CO₂ can help evaluate ventilation but shouldn’t be treated as a standalone measure of IAQ.
  • Health effects linked to typical indoor CO₂ levels are inconsistent and don’t justify changes to ventilation standards—yet.
  • Consumer-grade CO₂ sensors can mislead if not properly calibrated or positioned.
    ​​

The Misconception: CO₂ = IAQ?

Historically, CO₂ levels have been used to infer whether a room is "stuffy" or under-ventilated. But ASHRAE’s 2025 position document emphasizes this can be dangerously simplistic.
While rising CO₂ concentrations may correlate with increasing levels of other indoor pollutants (because they all rise in poorly ventilated spaces), CO₂ is not the pollutant to worry about. In fact:
  • Many indoor pollutants, like volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and particulates, aren't emitted in correlation with CO₂.
  • Removing CO₂ alone does not improve overall air quality.
​

What ASHRAE Now Recommends

ASHRAE's revised position includes several critical recommendations for research and practice:
1. Use CO₂ Only as a Supplemental Tool - CO₂ can still help assess outdoor air ventilation rates—but only if applied correctly, with validated assumptions and proper sensor placement.
2. Avoid Over-Reliance on CO₂ for Infection Control - CO₂ is often promoted as a proxy for airborne virus risk, but its relationship to disease transmission is complex and indirect. Infection risk also depends on occupancy patterns, space types, filtration systems, and more.
3. Do Not Use CO₂ to Justify Air Cleaning Alone - Technologies that remove only CO₂ may interfere with ventilation controls and give a false sense of safety about indoor air quality.​

Best Practices for Building Professionals

If you work in HVAC, construction, education, healthcare, or real estate, here’s how to adapt:
  • Calibrate CO₂ sensors regularly and ensure proper placement.
  • Use CO₂ alongside other IAQ indicators—not in isolation.
  • Educate clients and stakeholders about the limitations of CO₂ as a ventilation metric.
  • Stay current with ASHRAE Standard 62.1, which now includes updated CO₂ setpoints for DCV—not as health limits, but for operational guidance.
​

A Future with Rising Outdoor CO₂

​As outdoor CO₂ levels continue to rise due to global climate change, indoor readings will shift as well. This reality makes it more important than ever to distinguish between indoor-generated CO₂ and ambient levels, especially when fine-tuning ventilation systems.
​

Final Thoughts

ASHRAE’s new position on indoor CO₂ is a call for smarter, more holistic air quality management. By understanding the limitations of CO₂ as an IAQ metric—and by investing in comprehensive, evidence-based monitoring—you can make better decisions for occupant health, safety, and performance.
See How Your Building Measures Up
0 Comments

2025 WorkSafeBC Occupational Exposure Limits: Key Updates for Employers

3/15/2025

0 Comments

 
WorkSafeBC has updated its Occupational Exposure Limits (OELs) for 2025, aligning with the latest ACGIH Threshold Limit Values (TLVs). These changes impact industries handling solvents, fuels, herbicides, and industrial chemicals, making compliance with workplace safety regulations more critical than ever.
If your business operates in construction, manufacturing, agriculture, oil & gas, or chemical processing, it’s time to review workplace air quality and hazard assessments to ensure compliance with the new standards.

What Are Occupational Exposure Limits (OELs)?

Occupational Exposure Limits (OELs) define the maximum airborne concentration of hazardous chemicals that workers can be exposed to without adverse health effects. These limits help prevent long-term health risks and ensure workplace safety.
Types of Exposure Limits:
  • Time-Weighted Average (TWA): The average exposure over an 8-hour work shift.
  • Short-Term Exposure Limit (STEL): A 15-minute limit for short-term exposure spikes.
  • Ceiling Limit: The absolute maximum concentration that should never be exceeded.
Understanding and adhering to these limits is essential for regulatory compliance and worker safety.

​Here is a link to the WorkSafeBC E-Limits
​

2025 WorkSafeBC Exposure Limit Updates: Chemicals Affected

The latest WorkSafeBC updates include revised exposure limits for several industrial chemicals, solvents, and herbicides. Employers must take note of these changes to avoid regulatory penalties and protect worker health.
🧪 Diacetone Alcohol
  • Uses: Solvent in paints, coatings, varnishes, and cosmetics. Also found in textiles and chemical manufacturing.
  • Industries Affected: Painting, coatings, manufacturing, and printing.
  • Health Risks: Eye and respiratory irritation, potential effects on the central nervous system.
🌾 Dimethenamid-P (Inhalable Fraction & Vapour)
  • Uses: Pre-emergent herbicide for crops like corn and soybeans.
  • Industries Affected: Agriculture, landscaping, and agrochemical production.
  • Health Risks: Skin irritation, respiratory effects, and potential environmental persistence.
⛽ Heptane (Straight & Branched Isomers)
  • Uses: Found in adhesives, rubber cement, gasoline, and fuel blending.
  • Industries Affected: Automotive, chemical manufacturing, and laboratory research.
  • Health Risks: Dizziness, drowsiness, skin irritation, and potential nervous system effects.
🌿 Metribuzin (Inhalable Fraction)
  • Uses: Broad-spectrum herbicide used in potato, soybean, and tomato crops.
  • Industries Affected: Agriculture, pesticide manufacturing, and crop management.
  • Health Risks: Respiratory irritation, skin sensitivity, and long-term ecological impact.
💨 Triethylene Glycol (Inhalable Fraction & Vapour)
  • Uses: Found in antifreeze, disinfectants, air sanitizers, and natural gas processing.
  • Industries Affected: Oil & gas, HVAC, healthcare, and chemical processing.
  • Health Risks: Respiratory tract irritation and potential long-term central nervous system effects.
​

WorkSafeBC Compliance: What Employers Must Do

With these new occupational exposure limits (OELs) in effect, employers must take immediate action to ensure compliance and protect workers from hazardous exposure.
✅ Steps to Stay Compliant:✔️ Conduct Workplace Air Quality Testing: Measure airborne chemical levels to ensure compliance.
✔️ Review Hazard Assessments: Identify areas with high-risk chemical exposure.
✔️ Implement Exposure Control Measures: Improve ventilation, provide PPE, and update safety protocols.
✔️ Train Employees: Educate workers on exposure risks, protective equipment, and emergency procedures.
Failure to comply with these new regulations may result in penalties, legal consequences, and increased health risks for employees.​

Need Help Navigating These Changes?

At WHS, we specialize in occupational hygiene assessments, air monitoring, and exposure control solutions. Our team stays up to date with WorkSafeBC regulations and ACGIH exposure limits to help businesses stay compliant and protect their workforce.
📞 Contact us today to schedule a consultation or workplace air quality assessment.

Contact WHS Today
0 Comments

Addressing the Revised TLV for Benzene: Industrial Hygiene Challenges in Oil and Gas

1/25/2025

0 Comments

 
Benzene Sampling
Air Sampling for Benzene
The recent reduction of the ACGIH Threshold Limit Value (TLV) for benzene from 0.5 ppm to 0.02 ppm is a significant step forward in worker health and safety. This change particularly impacts federally regulated pipeline companies and oil and gas operations in Calgary and across British Columbia, where WorkSafeBC is in the process of adopting the revised TLV.

​As a certified industrial hygienist with over 20 years of experience, I have conducted extensive air sampling for benzene exposure in workplaces. The findings from recent sampling campaigns highlight the challenges employers face in meeting the updated benzene TLV and ensuring worker protection.
​

Key Findings on Benzene Exposure

  • Exposure Levels Exceeding the Revised TLV:
    Across various assessments, 8-hour time-weighted averages for benzene frequently range between 0.03 ppm and 0.20 ppm—well above the new TLV of 0.02 ppm. These results underscore the need for proactive strategies to mitigate exposure and protect workers.
  • Limitations of Current Air Sampling Instruments:
    • Many direct-reading instruments used for benzene monitoring have detection limits between 30 and 50 ppb. These tools are effective for previous exposure limits but lack the sensitivity to detect levels below 20 ppb.
    • To date, I have not identified any commercially available instruments capable of detecting benzene consistently below 20 ppb, presenting a significant challenge for employers aiming to comply with the revised TLV.
  • Challenges in Monitoring Low-Level Exposures:
    Standard NIOSH sampling methods and direct-reading instruments struggle to achieve the accuracy and sensitivity needed for benzene exposure near the updated TLV. Employers must explore advanced sampling strategies to ensure compliance.
​

What Does This Mean for Employers in Calgary and Beyond?

  • Compliance with the Revised TLV:
    Federally regulated industries and those operating under WorkSafeBC’s jurisdiction will need to re-evaluate their monitoring practices to align with the updated benzene TLV.
  • Improved Air Sampling Programs:
    Enhanced air sampling strategies are critical to accurately detect benzene levels below 0.02 ppm. Employers should assess their current programs and consider investing in advanced instruments or consulting experienced industrial hygiene professionals.
  • Proactive Worker Protection:
    Beyond regulatory compliance, addressing benzene exposure is an ethical responsibility. Employers must prioritize worker health by implementing robust monitoring and mitigation strategies.
​

The Role of Industrial Hygiene in Addressing Benzene Exposure

As an experienced industrial hygienist, I have a deep understanding of the complexities involved in monitoring and mitigating benzene exposure. My fieldwork in Calgary and BC has shown that proactive measures are essential to meet evolving safety standards. Employers should:
  • Evaluate current air sampling techniques to ensure accuracy at low detection levels.
  • Adapt to evolving standards by implementing effective monitoring programs tailored to specific work environments.
  • Engage experts in industrial hygiene to develop practical solutions that safeguard workers and ensure compliance.
​

Taking Action

The reduction in the benzene TLV highlights the critical need for updated monitoring practices and a renewed focus on worker safety. Employers in Calgary and BC must address these challenges head-on to ensure compliance and protect their workforce.
If you’re navigating the complexities of the revised TLV for benzene, I’m here to help. Let’s discuss how advanced air sampling strategies and expert guidance can ensure your workplace is safe and compliant.
Call WHS today!
0 Comments

The Hidden Costs of Poor Asbestos Abatement: A Cautionary Tale

10/28/2024

0 Comments

 
Asbestos Containing Materials in Houses
Asbestos containing materials in my house
When it comes to asbestos abatement, cutting corners can lead to disastrous consequences—both financially and emotionally. Unfortunately, many homeowners and businesses learn this the hard way when they hire unqualified contractors who fail to follow industry standards. At Western Health & Safety, we’ve seen firsthand how improper asbestos removal can spiral into a costly and stressful ordeal. 

​
In one such case, a family was forced to leave their home for three months, battling with their insurance company while enduring over $200,000 in abatement and surface sampling costs. The root cause? An abatement company that used untrained workers, skipped critical air sampling, and performed their own final inspections without involving a third-party consultant. This cautionary tale underscores the importance of hiring certified professionals and adhering to best practices in asbestos management.
​

The Risks of Unqualified Asbestos Contractors

Asbestos abatement is a highly regulated process for a reason. When asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) are disturbed, they release microscopic fibers into the air that can cause serious health issues, including lung cancer, asbestosis, and mesothelioma. Proper containment, removal, and air sampling are essential to ensure that these fibers do not pose a risk to the occupants of the building. In this particular case, the abatement company failed on multiple fronts:
  • Untrained Workers: The company employed workers who were not properly trained in asbestos removal, increasing the likelihood of improper handling and contamination.
  • No Third-Party Consultant: A third-party consultant is crucial to ensure that the abatement process is conducted safely and according to industry standards. Without this oversight, there was no objective verification that the work was done correctly.
  • No Air Sampling: Air sampling is a critical step in confirming that asbestos fibers have been safely removed from the environment. Skipping this step left the homeowners in a dangerous situation, with no assurance that their home was safe to re-enter.
  • Self-Performed Final Inspections: The contractor performed their own final inspections, raising serious concerns about the thoroughness and objectivity of the evaluation. Without independent verification, the homeowners were left in the dark about the true safety of their home.
​

The Financial and Emotional Toll

The consequences of these missteps were severe. The homeowners were displaced for three months, unable to return to their home while the situation was resolved. During this time, they faced a drawn-out battle with their insurance company, which was reluctant to cover the extensive costs of the abatement and surface sampling. In the end, over $200,000 was spent on remediation efforts before the family was finally allowed to move back in.
​
​
This case highlights not only the financial burden of improper asbestos abatement but also the emotional toll it can take on homeowners. Being displaced from your home, especially for an extended period, is a stressful and disruptive experience. Add to that the uncertainty of whether your home is truly safe, and it becomes clear why proper oversight and professional standards are so critical.

The Importance of Professional Oversight

At Western Health & Safety, we believe that every asbestos abatement project should be conducted with the highest level of professionalism and care. This means:
  • Certified Workers: All workers involved in asbestos removal should be properly trained and certified to handle hazardous materials safely. In Alberta workers should have Alberta Asbestos Worker Card issued by Alberta Labour, and in BC Workers should have their Level 2 - Asbestos Abatement Card and the company should be licensed through WorkSafeBC.
  • Third-Party Consultants: Independent consultants play a vital role in ensuring that the abatement process is conducted according to industry standards. They provide an objective assessment of the work and ensure that all safety protocols are followed.
  • Asbestos Pollution Insurance: Both the abatement contractor and the consultant must have the inclusion of Asbestos Pollution for at least $1,000,000 per occurrence as well as their Commercial General Liability Insurance,  The consultant should have an additional $1,000,000 coverage in errors and liability insurance.
  • Air Sampling: Air sampling should always be conducted before, during, and after the abatement process to confirm that asbestos fibers have been effectively removed from the environment.
  • Independent Final Inspections: Final inspections should be performed by a third-party consultant, not the contractor, to ensure that the work has been completed safely and thoroughly.
  • Clearance Letter: Following the asbestos abatement project, the contractor or the consultant should prepare a clearance letter stating that the asbestos abatement work is completed and that the building or area is safe to enter by unprotected personnel.
By adhering to these best practices, we can prevent situations like the one described above and protect the health and safety of homeowners and workers alike.
​

Conclusion: Don’t Cut Corners on Asbestos Abatement

Asbestos abatement is not an area where you can afford to cut corners. The risks are too high, both in terms of health and financial costs. At Western Health & Safety, we are committed to providing expert asbestos management services that prioritize safety, compliance, and peace of mind. Our team of certified professionals follows industry-leading protocols to ensure that every project is completed safely and efficiently.

If you’re facing an asbestos issue in your home or workplace, don’t leave it to chance. Contact Western Health & Safety today for a consultation and let us help you navigate the complexities of asbestos abatement with confidence.
Contact WHS
0 Comments

Manganese Exposure Risks in Welding: WHS Key Learnings

10/5/2024

0 Comments

 
Site Dam - Welding Fume
Welding operations, particularly Flux Core Arc Welding (FCAW), can expose workers to hazardous substances, including manganese, a metal commonly found in welding fumes. Prolonged exposure to manganese can lead to serious health issues, including neurological disorders such as manganism, which affects motor skills and cognitive function. A comprehensive statistical analysis was conducted to assess manganese exposure among workers involved in welding, brazing, grinding, and gouging. This analysis is crucial in applying the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle to minimize exposure to manganese and protect worker health.

​In this blog post, we will explore the findings from our recent project, focusing on the variability in manganese exposure across different worker groups and the importance of tailored control measures to reduce exposure.
​

Manganese Exposure: A Statistical Overview

A total of 32 samples were collected and analyzed to determine the concentration of manganese in the air. The results revealed significant variability in exposure levels across different worker groups, underscoring the need for customized control strategies.
All Samples
  • Geometric Mean Manganese Concentration: 0.013 mg/m³
  • Geometric Standard Deviation: 4.845
  • Confidence Limits: 0.025 to 0.108 mg/m³
These results indicate that while the average manganese concentration is relatively low, the wide range of confidence limits highlights the potential for higher exposure levels in certain work scenarios. This variability emphasizes the need for tailored control measures to ensure worker safety.
​

Exposure by Worker Group

Boilermakers
  • Geometric Mean Manganese Concentration: 0.017 mg/m³
  • Geometric Standard Deviation: 5.178
  • Confidence Limits: 0.029 to 0.332 mg/m³
The data for boilermakers shows a higher average exposure compared to the overall sample. The broad confidence limits suggest significant variability in exposure, likely due to different work environments and tasks. This group may require specific attention to exposure control, including enhanced ventilation and respiratory protection.

Millwrights
  • Geometric Mean Manganese Concentration: 0.024 mg/m³
  • Geometric Standard Deviation: 2.249
  • Confidence Limits: 0.015 to 0.329 mg/m³
Although only three samples were collected for millwrights, the results indicate a higher average exposure to manganese. The relatively narrow standard deviation suggests more consistent exposure levels, but the confidence limits still point to the need for consistent protective measures, such as local exhaust ventilation and personal protective equipment (PPE).


Fire Watches - in Confined Spaces
  • Geometric Mean Manganese Concentration: 0.011 mg/m³
  • Geometric Standard Deviation: 3.049
  • Confidence Limits: 0.015 to 0.725 mg/m³
The data for fire watches shows a lower average exposure, but the wide confidence limits (up to 0.725 mg/m³) highlight the potential for high exposure levels in certain situations. This group should be equipped with adequate respiratory protection to mitigate the risk of overexposure.

Confined Space Stand By Workers

  • Geometric Mean Manganese Concentration: 0.006 mg/m³
  • Geometric Standard Deviation: 6.091
  • Confidence Limits: 0.008 to 1.349 mg/m³
Stand By Workers had the lowest average exposure to manganese, but the extremely wide confidence limits (up to 1.349 mg/m³) indicate a significant potential for high variability in exposure levels. This group may benefit from continuous monitoring and adjustments to control measures to ensure that exposure remains within safe limits.
​

Implementing the ALARA Principle

The findings from the project underscore the necessity of adhering to the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle when managing manganese exposure in welding operations. The variability in exposure levels across different worker groups highlights the importance of implementing a comprehensive set of control measures, including:
  1. Engineering Controls:
    • Ventilation Systems: Proper ventilation, including local exhaust ventilation, is essential to reduce airborne manganese concentrations in the work area.
    • Fume Extraction: Using fume extraction systems at the source of welding can significantly reduce the amount of manganese and other hazardous substances in the air.
  2. Administrative Controls:
    • Worker Rotation: Rotating workers to minimize the duration of exposure can help reduce their overall exposure to manganese.
    • Training: Workers should be trained on the hazards of manganese exposure and the importance of using protective measures.
  3. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE):
    • Respiratory Protection: Given the potential for high exposure levels, especially for fire watches and hole watches, providing appropriate respiratory protection is critical.
    • Protective Clothing: Workers should also be equipped with protective clothing to prevent skin contact with welding fumes.
​

Continuous Monitoring and Assessment

The variability in manganese exposure levels across different worker groups at the  project highlights the importance of continuous monitoring and assessment. Regular air sampling and exposure assessments are essential to ensure that control measures remain effective and that workers are adequately protected from hazardous substances like manganese.

At Western Health & Safety (WHS), we specialize in conducting comprehensive welding fume exposure assessments, including monitoring for manganese and other hazardous substances. Our team of Certified Industrial Hygienists works closely with clients to develop tailored solutions that meet the specific needs of their workplace, ensuring compliance with safety regulations and protecting worker health.

Conclusion

Manganese exposure during welding, particularly in Flux Core Arc Welding (FCAW), poses significant health risks to workers. The findings from the project demonstrate the variability in exposure levels across different worker groups, emphasizing the need for tailored control measures and adherence to the ALARA principle. By implementing a combination of engineering controls, administrative controls, and PPE, employers can effectively manage and minimize workers' exposure to manganese, ensuring a safer and healthier workplace.

If you are concerned about manganese exposure in your workplace, contact Western Health & Safety today for a comprehensive welding fume exposure assessment. Our team of experts is here to help you protect your workforce and ensure compliance with occupational health standards.
Contact WHS Today!
0 Comments

Navigating Indoor Air Quality Standards and Guidelines

9/30/2024

0 Comments

 
In today’s world, creating safe, healthy, and sustainable buildings is more important than ever. Whether you're a building owner, facility manager, or an industrial hygienist, understanding the various building standards available can help you make informed decisions that benefit both occupants and the environment. Four key frameworks that guide building design and operation are WELL, LEED, ASHRAE, and the Alberta Infrastructure Guidelines. Each of these standards has a unique focus and offers distinct benefits. Let’s explore the differences and advantages of each.
​

WELL Building Standard

The WELL Building Standard is a performance-based system that focuses on the health and well-being of building occupants. It is designed to enhance human health through building design, operation, and behavior.
Key Focus Areas:
  • Air Quality: WELL emphasizes maintaining clean indoor air by reducing pollutants like particulate matter (PM2.5, PM10), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and carbon dioxide (CO2).
  • Water Quality: Ensures access to clean and safe drinking water.
  • Light: Promotes exposure to natural light and circadian lighting design to improve sleep and productivity.
  • Comfort: Focuses on thermal, acoustic, and ergonomic comfort to enhance occupant well-being.
  • Mind: Encourages mental health initiatives, such as biophilic design and stress-reduction spaces.
Benefits:
  • Health and Well-being: WELL-certified buildings prioritize occupant health, leading to improved productivity, reduced absenteeism, and enhanced mental well-being.
  • Employee Satisfaction: Companies that invest in WELL certification often see higher employee satisfaction and retention rates.
  • Market Differentiation: WELL certification is a mark of leadership in health-focused building design, setting your building apart from others.
​

LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design)

LEED is one of the most widely recognized green building certification systems in the world. It focuses on sustainability across various aspects of building design, construction, and operation.
Key Focus Areas:
  • Energy Efficiency: LEED encourages the use of energy-efficient systems and renewable energy sources.
  • Water Conservation: Promotes water-saving technologies and practices.
  • Materials and Resources: Encourages the use of sustainable, non-toxic materials and waste reduction strategies.
  • Indoor Environmental Quality: Focuses on improving air quality, lighting, and thermal comfort for occupants.
Benefits:
  • Environmental Impact: LEED-certified buildings reduce their carbon footprint, conserve water, and minimize waste, contributing to global sustainability efforts.
  • Cost Savings: LEED buildings often have lower operating costs due to energy and water efficiency measures.
  • Increased Property Value: LEED certification can increase a building’s market value and attract environmentally conscious tenants or buyers.
​

ASHRAE (American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers)

ASHRAE provides technical standards and guidelines primarily focused on HVAC (heating, ventilation, and air conditioning) systems and energy efficiency. ASHRAE standards are widely adopted in building codes and are essential for ensuring safe and efficient building operations.
Key Standards:
  • ASHRAE 62.1: Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality, which sets minimum ventilation rates to ensure good indoor air quality.
  • ASHRAE 90.1: Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings, which provides minimum energy efficiency requirements.
  • ASHRAE 55: Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy, which defines acceptable thermal comfort ranges for occupants.
Benefits:
  • Improved Indoor Air Quality: By following ASHRAE 62.1, buildings can ensure proper ventilation and reduce indoor pollutants, leading to healthier environments.
  • Energy Efficiency: ASHRAE 90.1 helps buildings optimize energy use, reducing operational costs and environmental impact.
  • Regulatory Compliance: Many building codes require adherence to ASHRAE standards, making them essential for compliance with local regulations.
​

Alberta Infrastructure Guidelines

The Alberta Infrastructure Guidelines are specific to government-owned and supported infrastructure in Alberta, Canada. These guidelines ensure that public buildings meet safety, functionality, and sustainability requirements.
Key Focus Areas:
  • Safety and Functionality: Ensures that public buildings are safe for occupants and meet functional requirements for their intended use.
  • Sustainability: Encourages the use of energy-efficient systems and sustainable building materials.
  • Indoor Air Quality: Provides specific guidance on maintaining good IAQ through proper ventilation, pollutant control, and regular maintenance.
Benefits:
  • Compliance with Provincial Regulations: Following these guidelines ensures that public sector projects (including schools)  in Alberta meet local regulatory requirements.
  • Enhanced Public Safety: The guidelines prioritize occupant safety, ensuring that public buildings are safe and healthy for all users.
  • Sustainability Goals: By incorporating energy-efficient systems and sustainable practices, the guidelines help align public buildings with Alberta’s sustainability goals.
​

Comparing the Standards

While all four frameworks aim to improve building performance, they each have a unique focus:
  • WELL: Prioritizes occupant health and well-being, making it ideal for workplaces and residential buildings focused on human-centric design.
  • LEED: Offers a comprehensive approach to sustainability, suitable for projects aiming to minimize environmental impact and enhance building performance.
  • ASHRAE: Provides technical standards for HVAC systems and energy efficiency, essential for optimizing building systems and ensuring regulatory compliance.
  • Alberta Infrastructure Guidelines: Ensures compliance with regional standards, focusing on safety, functionality, and sustainability in public infrastructure projects.
​

Which Standard is Right for Your Building?

Choosing the right standard depends on your project’s goals:
  • If your primary focus is on occupant health and well-being, the WELL Building Standard is the best choice.
  • For projects aiming to achieve sustainability and energy efficiency, LEED is the most comprehensive option.
  • If you need to ensure HVAC system performance and energy efficiency, adhering to ASHRAE standards is essential.
  • For public sector projects in Alberta, which includes schools, following the Alberta Infrastructure Guidelines ensures compliance with local regulations and safety standards.
​​

Conclusions

Each of these standards--WELL, LEED, ASHRAE, and the Alberta Infrastructure Guidelines—offers unique benefits that can enhance building design, operation, and occupant well-being. By understanding their differences, you can select the most appropriate framework for your project, ensuring that your building meets its specific goals for health, sustainability, and performance.
Whether you’re looking to improve indoor air quality, reduce energy consumption, or create a healthier environment for occupants, these standards provide the tools and guidance needed to achieve success.
Contact WHS Today
WHS IAQ Services
0 Comments

Understanding the Importance of Smoke and Fire Damage Assessments

8/19/2024

0 Comments

 
Wildfire Damage Assessment
In the aftermath of a fire, many property owners face overwhelming damage to their buildings and possessions. However, the visible destruction is only part of the problem. Hidden dangers, such as soot, ash, and other combustion by-products, can linger long after the flames have been extinguished, posing serious risks to both property and human health. This is where professional smoke and fire damage assessments become essential.
At Western Health & Safety (WHS), we specialize in providing comprehensive smoke and fire damage assessment services, with a strong emphasis on industrial hygiene. Our team, led by certified industrial hygienists, is dedicated to ensuring the safety of your property and the well-being of its occupants by using the latest testing methods and technologies to uncover the full extent of fire-related damage, including harmful substances like asbestos, lead, and mercury.
​

Why Are Smoke and Fire Damage Assessments Necessary?

​Fire doesn’t just destroy—its aftermath can leave behind harmful particulates, including soot, char, and ash, that can contaminate air, surfaces, and even HVAC systems. Additionally, fires can disturb hazardous materials like asbestos and release dangerous heavy metals such as lead and mercury into the environment. If these materials are not properly identified and remediated, they can lead to long-term health issues, including respiratory problems, neurological damage, and other serious conditions. Furthermore, lingering contaminants can accelerate the corrosion of building materials, leading to structural weaknesses over time.
​

What WHS Provides: Comprehensive Damage Assessments

Our smoke and fire damage services are designed to go beyond the visible surface. Here's how we help:
  1. Air Sampling: We perform advanced air quality testing using techniques like Gravimetric Analysis and Particle Count to identify harmful soot, asbestos fibers, and other airborne particles that could affect indoor environments. These tests are crucial in detecting the presence of lead and mercury in dust and air after a fire incident.
  2. Surface Sampling: Using methods such as Micro-Vacuuming and Tape Lifting, our team collects samples from both porous and non-porous surfaces to identify residual smoke particles. Additionally, we test for asbestos, lead, mercury, and other hazardous substances that may have been disturbed or released during the fire. These tests allow us to measure the level of contamination and determine the best remediation approach.
  3. Microscopic Analysis: Utilizing cutting-edge technologies such as Reflected Light Microscopy (RLM) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), WHS identifies and quantifies combustion by-products and hazardous materials like asbestos and heavy metals, providing precise data on the nature and extent of the contamination.
  4. Combustion By-Product Testing: Our experts analyze for carbon black, soot, and other harmful substances, ensuring thorough identification of fire-related contaminants. In addition, we conduct specialized testing for heavy metals like lead and mercury, which can pose serious health risks if not properly remediated. This data helps determine the appropriate cleaning and remediation measures to restore the environment safely.
  5. Customized Reporting and Action Plans: After completing our assessment, WHS provides detailed reports with actionable insights on the scope of the damage. We recommend tailored remediation strategies to address the specific needs of your property, ensuring safety and compliance with local regulations, including handling asbestos, lead, and mercury contamination.
​

The WHS Difference: Expertise in Industrial Hygiene

With years of experience in Alberta and BC, WHS stands out by offering personalized, field-driven solutions that larger multidisciplinary firms may overlook. Our team of certified industrial hygienists brings extensive expertise in industrial hygiene, specializing in the detection and control of hazardous materials such as asbestos, lead, and mercury. Our hands-on approach and boutique services mean we are fully dedicated to identifying and addressing even the most complex fire damage scenarios. We stay up-to-date with the latest methodologies and technologies, ensuring that our clients receive accurate and timely assessments.

Protecting Your Property, Protecting Your Health

At WHS, our mission is to safeguard both property and public health by reducing exposure to toxic substances resulting from fires. Our smoke and fire damage assessments are designed to help property owners, facility managers, and contractors understand the full impact of fire damage, including the disturbance of hazardous materials like asbestos, lead, and mercury. By taking proactive steps to restore safety and health to the affected areas, we ensure that your property is not only restored but also made safe for future use.


Don’t let hidden fire damage and hazardous materials affect the safety of your home or business. Contact WHS today to schedule a professional fire damage assessment, and let us help you ensure your property is safe, clean, and secure.

Contact WHS Today
WHS Wildfire Services
0 Comments

Ensuring Accurate Noise Exposure Assessments

8/7/2024

0 Comments

 
Industrial Hygiene - Noise Sampling
​At Western Health & Safety, we prioritize the well-being of workers across various industries by providing top-notch occupational hygiene services. One critical aspect of our services is the accurate assessment of noise exposure, which is vital for protecting workers' hearing and overall health. In this blog post, we'll walk you through our comprehensive Noise Dosimetry Standard Operating Procedure (SOP), detailing how we conduct noise assessments to ensure compliance with safety standards and regulations.
​

NOISE DOSIMTERY PROTOCOLS

The primary goal of our Noise Dosimetry Protocols is to outline a clear and consistent method for measuring workers' exposure to noise levels. By adhering to this Protocol, we can provide reliable data that informs our clients' decisions on managing noise risks in the workplace. This SOP applies to all noise dosimetry activities we conduct, covering both individual and group assessments, including the determination of Similar Exposure Groups (SEGs).  WHS Sampling protocol is compliant with the CSA Z107.56-18 - Measurement of noise exposure, and ​NIOSH Guide to Occupational Exposure Sampling (Leidel et al., 1977).
​

Similar Exposure Groups (SEGs)

SEGs are essential in noise exposure assessment, as they group workers who have similar noise exposure levels due to comparable tasks, work areas, and equipment usage. To accurately determine SEGs, we consider several factors:
  • Work Tasks: We group workers performing similar tasks.
  • Acoustical Environment: We assess the similarity of work environments, including proximity to noise sources.
  • Equipment and Tools: We evaluate the type and frequency of use of noise-generating equipment.
  • Shifts and Work Patterns: We consider workers' shifts and exposure durations.
For smaller groups, such as a team of 12 workers, we carefully analyze each worker's tasks and environments to determine if they belong to a single SEG or multiple SEGs. This ensures that workers within an SEG experience homogenous exposure.
​

Sampling Strategy

To ensure accurate measurements, we use calibrated sound level meters and dosimeters. Our sampling strategy involves determining the appropriate number of samples based on group size. For instance:
  • For a group size of 8, we sample 7 individuals.
  • For a group size of 11-12, we sample 10 individuals.
  • For a group size of 25-29, we sample 15 individuals.
These samples are collected throughout a typical work shift, using logging dosimeters to record noise levels continuously.
​

ENSURING PRECISION AND ACCURACY

Our data analysis process follows a precise measurement procedure:
  • If a single measurement result is within 6 dB of the criterion sound level (e.g., 85 dBA), we repeat the measurement.
  • If two measurements are within 2 dB and the average result falls within 2 dB on each side of the criterion sound level, further measurements are deemed unnecessary. Otherwise, more measurements are taken.
For example, if the criterion level is 85 dBA and the measurement result is 101 dBA, no further measurements are needed. However, if two measurements yield 82 and 84 dBA, additional measurements are required.
​
We combine individual Leq measurements to determine the group's exposure level, using the following formula:
Leq - equation

COMPRESHENSIVE REPORTING

Our reports include all mandatory elements, such as compliance statements, measurement dates, worker details, and equipment used. Optional elements like product characteristics and extraneous noise sources are also documented. This thorough reporting ensures that our clients have all the necessary information to understand and manage noise exposure risks effectively.
We uphold rigorous quality control and assurance standards, ensuring consistency in measurement procedures and data accuracy. Any deviations from the standard procedure are documented and justified.
​

STAYING CURRENT WITH STANDRARDS

We align our SOP with industry standards, including the CSA Z107.56-18 - Measurement of noise exposure and the NIOSH Guide to Occupational Exposure Sampling. Our SOP is reviewed annually or whenever significant changes occur in work processes or regulations.

CONCLUSIONS
At Western Health & Safety, our commitment to excellence extends to every project we undertake. By following our detailed Noise Dosimetry SOP, we ensure that all noise exposure assessments are accurate, reliable, and compliant with the latest standards. This dedication helps us protect workers' health and safety, fostering safer and healthier workplaces across all industries.
WHS Noise Services
Contact WHS Today
0 Comments

Elevating Workplace Safety in Calgary: Integrating Industrial Hygiene with Human and Organizational Performance (HOP)

5/19/2024

0 Comments

 
Workplace safety is paramount in ensuring the health and well-being of employees and the efficiency of operations. In Calgary, a city known for its diverse industries including oil and gas, construction, and manufacturing, enhancing workplace safety is crucial. Integrating Industrial Hygiene (IH) with Human and Organizational Performance (HOP) offers a comprehensive approach to improving safety outcomes.
​

UNDERSTANDING INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE

Industrial Hygiene focuses on identifying, evaluating, and controlling environmental factors that may cause illness, injury, or discomfort in the workplace. Key aspects include:
  • Hazard Identification: Recognizing potential sources of harm, such as chemical, physical, biological, and ergonomic hazards.
  • Exposure Assessment: Measuring the extent of employee exposure to harmful agents.
  • Control Measures: Implementing engineering controls, administrative controls, and personal protective equipment (PPE) to mitigate risks.
​​​

Exploring Human and Organizational Performance (HOP)

HOP is a systems-based approach to safety that emphasizes understanding human behavior and organizational factors that influence performance. Core principles of HOP include:
  • Error is Normal: Recognizing that humans are fallible and errors are inevitable.
  • Blame Fixes Nothing: Focusing on learning and improvement rather than assigning blame.
  • Context Drives Behavior: Understanding the context in which work occurs to identify why errors happen.
  • Learning and Improvement: Continuously seeking opportunities to learn and enhance processes.
  • Response Matters: Responding to incidents in a way that supports recovery and learning.
​

Integrating IH with HOP

Combining IH with HOP creates a robust safety framework that addresses both environmental hazards and human factors. Key integration strategies include:
  • Comprehensive Hazard Analysis: Using IH techniques to identify hazards and HOP principles to understand how human and organizational factors influence risk.
  • Holistic Training Programs: Developing training that covers both technical aspects of hazard control and the behavioral aspects of safety.
  • Incident Investigation: Applying IH methods to determine the presence of hazards and HOP approaches to understand the role of human behavior and organizational context in incidents.
  • Continuous Improvement: Leveraging IH data to inform HOP-driven initiatives for ongoing safety enhancements.
​

CASE STUDY: IMPLEMENTING IH & HOP IN CALGARY OIL & GAS INDUSTRY

Scenario: A Calgary-based oil and gas company aimed to reduce incidents of chemical exposure and improve overall safety culture.
Approach:
  1. Hazard Identification and Control: The IH team conducted a thorough assessment of chemical hazards and implemented engineering controls such as improved ventilation and enclosed systems. PPE was provided where necessary.
  2. HOP Integration: Training sessions were held to educate employees on the importance of safety protocols and the role of human behavior in maintaining a safe work environment. Employees were encouraged to report near-misses and potential hazards without fear of blame.
  3. Incident Analysis: Following an incident of chemical exposure, an investigation was carried out using both IH and HOP methodologies. The IH team identified a failure in the ventilation system, while the HOP analysis revealed that maintenance protocols were not followed due to unclear communication.
  4. Improvements: The company improved its maintenance protocols, clarified communication channels, and continued to monitor the effectiveness of the ventilation system.
Results: 
​
The integration of IH and HOP led to a significant reduction in chemical exposure incidents and fostered a culture of safety and continuous improvement.

CONCLUSIONS:

​Integrating Industrial Hygiene with Human and Organizational Performance provides a comprehensive approach to workplace safety in Calgary. By addressing both environmental hazards and human factors, organizations can create safer work environments, reduce incidents, and promote a culture of continuous learning and improvement. This holistic approach not only protects employees but also enhances overall operational efficiency and productivity.
Contact WHS Today!
0 Comments
First
Next
Last

OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE CONSULTING - Servicing ALbeRTA & BC


Hours

M-F: 8am - 5pm

Telephone

403-241-6889

Email

[email protected]
  • WHS Home
    • WHS Mission
    • WHS Advantage
    • WHS Commitment
    • Artificial Intelligence Policy
  • WHS Core Services
    • Litigation Services
    • Worker Exposure Assessments Services >
      • Welding Fume Assessments
      • Respirable Crystalline Silica
      • BTEX Sampling
      • Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials
      • Isocyanate Sampling and Testing
    • Asbestos Services and Expertise >
      • Asbestos Testing and Sampling Calgary
      • Hazardous Building Materials Investigations
      • Asbestos Management >
        • Asbestos Safety and Testing Services in Calgary
      • Asbestos Worker Certification >
        • Asbestos Training FAQ's
      • Asbestos Testing FAQ's
      • vermiculite Insulation Asbestos >
        • Vermiculite in Building Products
        • MK-5 Spray Applied Fire Proofing
      • Asbestos Contaminated Soil
      • Asbestos Surface Contamination
      • Alberta Asbestos Abatement Manual
      • Why Certified Industrial Hygienists (CIH) Matter in Asbestos Assessments
    • Exposure Control Plans for Designated Substances
    • Indoor Air Quality >
      • Indoor Air Quality Assessments
      • Radon Assessments >
        • Radon FAQ
      • Mould Assessments >
        • Mould Sampling
        • Types of Mould
    • Noise Exposure Assessment >
      • Noise Assessment Services
      • New AB Noise Regulation
      • Frequently Asked Questions - Noise
    • Confined Space
    • Disaster Response Testing Services
  • Contact WHS
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Industrial Hygiene Blog